Paris. Turn of the century. Smog filled city streets
bustling with people. Queue the introduction of Walter Benjamin’s ‘Arcades Project’. Amidst the masses, teeming with sin and other treacherous activities, the flaneur walks through the
crowds, an anonymous figure, noticed by none, yet seeing all, as much a part of his environment than a simple observer. Parisian arcades
are created to control the masses of people. But these arcades are built for a
reason. These Parisian arcades were created with the intention of controlling the flow of the masses and lighting the
area, and so inducing the sense of a panopticon, where the individual would be
under the impression that their actions were being watched. This development in urbanism invited a change towards the
definition of the flaneur, as now the flaneur embraced attention, walking pointedly
yet with no destination, an image of splendour, and a spectacle to behold. (Prouty,
2009)
Image from: http://thecharnelhouse.org |
Yet it is interesting to consider that in online space and
place in modern days, the flaneur has made an appearance. Lurking through the Internet
anonymously, watching and observing, the flaneur is ever present as they were in 19th century Paris. Dr. Kuttainen (2015) argues that the
‘cyber-flaneur’ enjoys ambling through social space and drawing attention to
themselves as a spectacle much like the flaneur in 19th century
Paris. Tumblr, for example, allows the cyber-flaneur to idly explore the vast reaches
of blogs, images, videos and gifs, enabling the cyber-flaneur to observe from a
distance while creating their own sense of identity through their personal space and place.
The fore mentioned concept of the panopticon can be related to
the cyber-flaneur as observed by Gaylene Barnes (1997) who argues that “the
cyber-flaneur knows that they are also objects of a continuous scrutiny”, due
to living in a surveillance society where all our actions are monitored. Barnes furthers the argument, noting that cyber-flaneur’s are aware of the possibility of being
monitored, just as prison inmates would in a panopticon prison, which is a
factor that may explain why the flaneur still flourishes – even in virtual
reality, as the modern flaneur enjoys the attention, while also revelling in observing others. Perhaps, in a sense, we are all cyber-flaneurs; although we don't walk the streets of Paris while walking turtles, (Prouty, 2009) we all display ourselves, or a version of ourselves, on virtual space in order to gain attention, developing our sense of identity as we idly explore the vast reaches of the online space.
References:
Arcades Project. (2015).
In Wikipedia. Retrieved August
19th, 2015, from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arcades_Project
Barnes, G. (1997). Passage of the Cyber-Flaneur. USA: Otago
University.
Kuttainen, V. (2015). BA1002: Our Space: Networks,
Narratives, and the Making of Place, Lecture 4: Maps. [PowerPoint Slides].
Retrieved from: http://learnjcu.edu.au
Prouty, R. (2009). A
turtle on a leash. Retrieved from: http://www.onewaystreet.typepad.com/one_way_street/2009/10/a-turtle-on-a-leash.html
Picture Reference:
The Charnel-House. (n.d.). The Parisian Arcades. [Image]. Retrieved from: http://thecharnelhouse.org
I definitely don’t walk the streets of Paris while walking turtles, although completely agree with being a Flaneur, a cyber-flaneur. As I do find myself scrolling through social media in particularly Facebook watching others but under no illusion I am not being watched myself. I find it very interesting you related the Arcades and flâneur to the panopticon. Although in terms of a cyber-flaneur, the panopticon theory isn’t necessarily stopping internet users from ‘misbehaving’ even though they are being monitored. Bullies, hackers, thieves, cyber-flâneurs in effect can hide behind the internet and participates, unlike the original flâneur mentioned by Prouty (2009) whom in fact was a “detached observer” unaffected by their surroundings. These online criminals rely on the ability to watch but furthermore have the capacity to partake in their surroundings or in this case the internet site. The internet, as well has having a very exposing aspect also has a ‘back stage’ a facility to sneak and not being noticed conflicting with the cyber-flâneur concept.
ReplyDeleteReference:
Prouty, R. (2009). Turtle on a leash. Retrieved from http://www.onewaystreet.typepad.com/one_way_street/2009/10/a-turtle-on-a-leash.html